Evaluation of mycelium as a
biomaterial in social housing in Guayaquil
Evaluación
del micelio como biomaterial en viviendas de interés social en Guayaquil
Jamil Ignacio Palacios Murillo
Universidad Católica Santiago de Guayaquil, Ecuador,
jamil.palaciosm@ug.edu.ec
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4626-7697
Gabriela Catherine Vega Guiracocha
Universidad de Guayaquil, Ecuador, gabriela.vegag@ug.edu.ec
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2204-9660
Laura de Jesús Calero Proaño
Universidad de Guayaquil, Ecuador, laura.calerop@ug.edu.ec
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1742-4363
![]()
).fld/image006.png)
The
housing deficit in Ecuador constitutes a significant social and urban problem,
especially in vulnerable sectors of Guayaquil. This research analyzes the
potential of mycelium as an ecological material for the construction of modular
social housing under the principles of the circular economy. High malleability
and diversity in interior design can be achieved when applied to social
housing, promoting the circular economy through the reuse and self-construction
of its components. This contributes to reducing housing costs and improving the
acoustic and climatic quality of the dwelling due to its inherent properties,
making mycelium an ideal material for increasing access to decent and
affordable housing. Through a descriptive and analytical approach, the
physical, environmental, and economic properties of mycelium are examined, as
well as its applicability in walls and roofs.
The results show that mycelium offers significant advantages in terms of
sustainability, cost reduction, thermal and acoustic insulation, and the use of
local organic waste. It is concluded that mycelium represents a viable
alternative for improving access to decent housing, contributing to sustainable
urban development and reducing the environmental impact of the construction
sector.
Keywords: mycelium, ecological material, circular economy,
flexible architecture
Resumen
El déficit habitacional en
Ecuador constituye un problema social y urbano significativo, especialmente en
sectores vulnerables de Guayaquil. Esta investigación analiza el potencial del
micelio como material ecológico para la construcción de viviendas modulares de
interés social bajo los principios de la economía circular. Se puede obtener
gran maleabilidad y diversidad del diseño interior, aplicado en las denominadas
viviendas sociales, promoviendo la economía circular a través de la
reutilización y autoconstrucción de sus componentes. lo que contribuye a la
reducción del coste de la vivienda y mejora la calidad acústica y climática de
la vivienda debido a sus propiedades propias, que hacen del micelio un material
ideal para incrementar el acceso a una vivienda digna y asequible. Mediante un
enfoque descriptivo y analítico, se examinan las propiedades físicas,
ambientales y económicas del micelio, así como su aplicabilidad en muros y
cubiertas. Los resultados evidencian que el micelio presenta ventajas relevantes
en términos de sostenibilidad, reducción de costos, aislamiento térmico y
acústico, y aprovechamiento de residuos orgánicos locales. Se concluye que el
micelio representa una alternativa viable para mejorar la accesibilidad a
viviendas dignas, contribuyendo al desarrollo urbano sostenible y a la
reducción del impacto ambiental del sector constructivo.
Palabras Clave: micelio, material ecológico, economía
circular, arquitectura flexible
Access to decent housing is
a fundamental right recognized in the Constitution of Ecuador; however, a
significant portion of the population faces overcrowding and precarious housing
conditions. Informal employment and the high cost of traditional materials have
limited access to adequate housing, especially in rapidly growing urban areas
such as Guayaquil. In this context, the search for innovative and sustainable
materials becomes a priority in order to respond to the housing deficit.
Mycelium, the filamentous structure of fungi,
has emerged as a biotechnological material with applications in sustainable
construction. Its low environmental impact, biodegradability, and insulating
properties position it as a viable alternative to conventional materials. This
article analyzes the use of mycelium in the design of modular social housing in
Guayaquil, under a circular economy approach.
In this context, the circular economy has
emerged as a crucial strategy. This approach seeks to reduce waste and extend
the useful life cycle of products through recycling, reuse, and the utilization
of resources that would traditionally be discarded. Within this perspective,
the use of mycelium—the vegetative structure of fungi—is positioned as an
innovative and sustainable option. Its ability to colonize organic substrates
such as straw, sawdust, and other agricultural waste allows this waste to be transformed
into solid, functional panels suitable for various construction applications.
Mycelium stands out not only for its physical
and thermal characteristics, but also for its low environmental impact. When
consolidated into lightweight, insulating panels, it can replace conventional
materials that require highly polluting processes, such as cement or
petroleum-derived polymers. In addition, its ability to biodegrade and
reintegrate into the environment at the end of its useful life makes it a clear
example of a regenerative material within the natural cycle.
Mycelium, the filamentous branched structure
of fungi, has become a biomaterial of growing interest for use in sustainable
housing construction. Its high versatility, mechanical properties, and
biodegradability position it as a strategic resource within the circular
economy. This article presents research focused on the production of mycelium
panels for use in social housing construction, evaluating their mechanical
strength, thermal behavior, and economic viability. Through laboratory tests,
the ability of mycelium to form rigid and resistant structures was determined,
while its potential to reduce the carbon footprint and dependence on
traditional materials with high emissions was analyzed. The results indicate
that mycelium can offer acceptable thermal insulation and durability properties
for use in low-cost residential environments, while also being a renewable,
compostable material with reduced environmental impact. This research seeks to
contribute to the scientific literature on biomaterials and promote a paradigm
shift in social housing construction, emphasizing the importance of the
circular economy and sustainable innovation.
This article presents a comprehensive
approach to the production and evaluation of mycelium panels, considering their
mechanical, thermal, economic, and environmental properties. The research
builds on previous studies that have highlighted the viability of this
biomaterial (Stamets, 2005; Bayer & McIntyre, 2017; Jiang et al., 2019),
but goes further by providing a detailed analysis of the specific conditions
necessary for its manufacture and application in regions with hot and humid
climates. It also explores the technical challenges and economic opportunities
associated with its larger-scale production.
Throughout this work, the methodology used is
first presented, which includes the selection and treatment of agricultural
waste, the inoculation of the mycelium, and the formation of panels. The
results section presents the values obtained in mechanical and thermal
resistance tests, complemented by a production cost analysis and an
environmental impact assessment based on the product's life cycle. The
discussion analyzes the practical feasibility and possible limitations of the
material, while the final reflection highlights its potential to transform
current construction practices toward more responsible and sustainable models.
Methodology
The methodological approach
of this research is based on the premise of developing a biomaterial suitable
for hot and humid climates, where thermal insulation and moisture resistance
play a crucial role. The work plan was divided into stages ranging from the
collection and preparation of agricultural waste to mechanical and thermal
testing, including a cost analysis and assessment of the potential
environmental impact. This holistic approach allows not only for the validation
of the properties of the material itself, but also for an understanding of its
position within a value chain that aims to be more sustainable.
Wheat straw and pine sawdust were chosen for
use. These residues are abundant after grain harvesting and wood processing in
sawmills, respectively. From a circular economy perspective, the use of this
waste represents an opportunity to avoid burning or landfilling. Agreements
were made with local farmers and small sawmills to collect the raw material at
low cost or free of charge.
In order to optimize colonization by the
mycelium, impurities present in the straw (stones, plastic debris, large plant
fragments) were removed. In the case of sawdust, it was sieved to remove
excessively large particles or small metal contaminants (nails, staples, etc.).
The straw was then chopped to a size of 5-10 mm, thus facilitating its handling
and uniformity in the mixing process.
To ensure proper moisture content, both types
of waste were dried at 60°C on flat trays, stirring them regularly to prevent
moisture retention at the bottom. This drying process facilitates subsequent
sterilization and reduces the risk of unwanted fungi or bacteria growth.
After drying, the waste was packed in
polypropylene bags and placed in an autoclave at 121°C and 15 psi for 30
minutes. This process eliminates most competing microorganisms, creating a
sterile or near-sterile environment for mycelium inoculation. It should be
noted that sterilization is a critical step: without it, the probability of
contamination can increase exponentially, affecting the quality and resistance
of the resulting panels.
The selected mycelium was Ganoderma lucidum,
known for its rapid growth and robust filaments. Other fungal species have also
shown remarkable potential, such as Pleurotus ostreatus or Fomes fomentarius,
but G. lucidum stands out for its ability to produce a dense and highly
cohesive mycelial network, qualities that are essential for the formation of
resistant panels (Yang et al., 2021).
Before inoculating large volumes of
substrate, the strain was cultured on agar plates enriched with malt extract
(MEA). These plates were incubated at 25°C and monitored for approximately 10
days until the agar was completely colonized. This yielded pieces of mycelium
in optimal condition, which then served as the basis for the main production
batch.
With the sterilized substrate already cold,
the mycelium was mixed in a ratio of 1:4 (mycelium:substrate, on a dry basis)
or 1:3 in some exploratory tests. The mixture was placed in perforated
polypropylene bags, which were then sealed to maintain an atmosphere with some
air circulation. The set was placed in a chamber at 25°C and 60% relative
humidity, under dim light conditions. For about 15 days, the mycelium expanded
throughout the substrate, creating a cohesive whitish mass that indicated the
presence of dense fungal filaments.
Once incubation was complete, the colonized
substrate was transferred to 30 cm x 30 cm x 5 cm wooden or metal molds, which
had been previously disinfected with 70% ethanol. Compaction was carried out
using manual presses or simple devices, with the aim of distributing the
material evenly. The degree of compaction influences the resulting density of
the panel, a variable that, in turn, affects mechanical strength and insulation
properties.
The molds were kept in an environment with a
temperature of 22°C and approximately 60% humidity for an additional 5 days.
During this period, often called “controlled fruiting,” the mycelium finished
forming bridges between the substrate particles, reinforcing the structural
integrity of the panel. Care was taken to ensure that there were no signs of
contamination or excess moisture that could promote the proliferation of
undesirable molds.
After this time, the panels were carefully
removed from the molds to avoid breakage due to bending or traction. They were
then placed in an oven at 50°C for 48 hours, reducing their moisture content to
less than 10%. This drying effectively “inactivates” the growth of the
mycelium, preventing it from reactivating in higher humidity conditions and
promoting dimensional stability.
To evaluate compressive strength, ASTM D1037,
frequently applied to wood-based panels and boards, was followed. Test
specimens were extracted from each panel, taking care to preserve the integrity
of the mycelial structure. A universal testing machine applied an axial load at
5 mm/min until the test piece collapsed. The maximum load value (in N) was
recorded and the tensile strength (in MPa) was calculated.
The flexural test was performed with
three-point support. The sample was placed on two supports and the force was
applied at the midpoint at a constant speed. The modulus of rupture (MOR),
which indicates the maximum resistance before fracture, and the modulus of
elasticity (MOE), which reflects the stiffness of the panel in the elastic
range, were determined. These data allow us to understand whether the panels
can withstand bending stresses in partition wall or interior cladding
applications.
Thermal conductivity was evaluated using a
hot plate analyzer in accordance with ISO 8302:1991. The panels were placed
between two plates whose temperature difference was carefully controlled,
measuring the heat flow through the material. This yielded a k value (W/mK), a
crucial parameter for measuring insulation effectiveness.
As an approximation to real-world
application, test modules were built with walls incorporating a layer of
mycelial panels. A climatic chamber was used to subject these walls to
differences in temperature and humidity, simulating daily conditions in a hot
and humid environment. The objective was to quantify the reduction in heat
transfer compared to walls without additional insulation.
The production of a standard panel (30 cm x
30 cm x 5 cm) involved costs for raw materials (agricultural waste, mycelium),
labor (preparation, inoculation, growth monitoring), energy (sterilization,
drying), and transportation. An average of USD 3.5 per panel was established
under low-scale conditions. However, it is anticipated that industrial or
semi-industrial production—with higher volume and process optimization—could
reduce the unit cost by up to 25%.
A simplified LCA was undertaken to estimate
the carbon footprint associated with the production of the panels. The phases
considered included the collection of agricultural waste, the use of energy for
sterilization and drying, and transport logistics. Special importance was given
to the possibility of composting the panels at the end of their useful life,
which significantly reduces the environmental impact by avoiding disposal in
landfills and allowing organic matter to return to the soil.
The analysis shows that mycelium
has technical characteristics suitable for use in walls and roofs, highlighting
its thermal and acoustic insulation capacity, its structural lightness, and its
low production cost. The possibility of cultivating it from local organic waste
strengthens the principles of the circular economy, reducing waste and carbon
emissions.
In the context of Las Orquídeas, the application of modular construction systems
with mycelium would allow for significant cost reductions, faster execution,
and improvements in housing comfort. However, challenges related to the
durability, production scalability, and social acceptance of the material have
been identified, aspects that require further research and pilot projects.
The following sections present the
characteristic values obtained from mechanical and thermal tests, as well as an
overview of the economic feasibility and environmental impact of incorporating
mycelium panels into the construction sector.
The tested panels offered an average
compressive strength of 1.2 MPa, with intervals from 1.0 to 1.4 MPa depending
on the variation in compaction and density. Although the panels are not
intended to withstand very high structural loads, their mechanical performance
is sufficient for use as interior enclosures, lightweight partitions, or even
decorative ceiling panels.
Bending tests resulted in an average MOR
value of 3.5 MPa. This indicates that the panels tolerate moderate bending
stresses before fracturing. The MOE, close to 300 MPa, reflects acceptable
stiffness, although lower than that of solid wood or OSB boards. However, in
applications where high stiffness is not required (e.g., room dividers,
decorations, internal insulation panels), these properties are adequate.
Differences in density were noted in some
panels due to irregular compaction or variations in the colonization rate of
the mycelium. These internal defects resulted in microcracks and localized
reductions in strength. It was found that precision in compaction pressure and
careful control of humidity during incubation mitigated these inconsistencies.
The panels exhibited an average thermal
conductivity coefficient of 0.04 W/mK. This value is remarkably similar to that
of glass wool or expanded polystyrene, which are known for their high
insulating power. In hot and humid areas, this type of insulation can make a
substantial difference in reducing the heat entering a home, reducing
dependence on air conditioning or forced ventilation systems.
When the panels were integrated into test
walls, heat transfer decreased by about 30% compared to walls without any
insulation. This tangible reduction in heat flow means potential energy savings
and increased thermal comfort. Furthermore, the lightness of the panels does
not add significant loads to the structure, simplifying their installation and
adaptation in low-budget construction projects.
On a small scale, each 30 cm x 30 cm x 5 cm
panel cost around USD 3.5, taking into account the energy consumed in
sterilization, drying, and incubation, as well as the labor involved. The raw
material (agricultural waste) can be almost free or very low cost, provided
that agreements are established with local producers. The prospect of
industrial scaling indicates that, by increasing the volume of production, the
unit cost could be reduced by at least 25%, approaching competitive values
compared to other ecological insulators.
Mycelium can be a catalyst for the local
economy by promoting interaction between farmers, waste managers, worker
cooperatives, and the construction sector. This would create a value chain that
takes advantage of discarded organic matter and transforms it into high
value-added panels. To achieve this, training initiatives and a minimum demand
are required to ensure the profitability of production.
As they do not require high-temperature
processes (beyond occasional sterilization at 121°C and drying at 50°C),
mycelium panels emit considerably less CO₂ than materials such as fired bricks or cement. In addition, production
is based on waste recycling, mitigating the problem of waste accumulation in
landfills and avoiding open-air burning (a practice that can contribute to air
pollution).
Once the panels have reached the end of their
useful life, composting allows the nutrients to be returned to the soil,
closing the life cycle in an environmentally friendly way. This embodies one of
the pillars of the circular economy, in which waste from one process becomes
input for another, avoiding the negative impact associated with final disposal
in landfills or dumps.
The results analyzed show that mycelium
panels offer a realistic opportunity to contribute to innovation in the
construction sector. Although their compressive and flexural strength does not
make them suitable for supporting heavy loads, they stand out as an alternative
for interior walls, enclosure modules, and thermal insulation that improves
energy efficiency. This is particularly relevant in hot and humid climates,
where a large part of the electricity bill is spent on cooling spaces and where
humidity can easily damage materials that are not resistant to the
proliferation of microorganisms.
The adoption of these panels depends,
however, on several factors. Among them, it is worth mentioning the
standardization of production, which requires careful control of humidity and
temperature during incubation, as well as the pressure applied during compaction.
Any deviation can lead to heterogeneities that result in significant variations
in mechanical properties. Therefore, improvements in the automation of certain
processes, such as pasteurization or inoculation, and the implementation of
sensors to monitor the internal humidity of the panels as they consolidate are
suggested.
On the other hand, social acceptance and
regulatory validation are essential milestones for the scalability of this
technology. Institutions responsible for regulating construction often require
defined standards for durability, fire reaction, moisture resistance, and other
parameters related to safety and health. As a novel material, mycelium faces
the challenge of demonstrating in standardized tests that it meets the
expectations of current building codes. Therefore, specific tests of fire
resistance, behavior under prolonged moisture absorption, and potential for
pest attacks are essential to legitimize its use.
Economically, feasibility depends on the
proximity of agricultural waste sources, access to sterilization equipment, and
the cost of mycelium. Likewise, public policies that encourage sustainable
construction and the corporate social responsibility of some construction
companies can pave the way for the introduction of this biomaterial into the
market. It is worth noting the possibility of involving small agricultural
producers in the supply of raw materials, thus promoting job creation and local
development.
Finally, the environmental approach marks an
essential difference: not only is the carbon footprint of the material's
production estimated to be low, but the compostability of the panels guarantees
environmentally friendly disposal at the end of their life cycle. This feature
is becoming increasingly important in a society struggling with the effects of
global warming and high volumes of non-recyclable waste. Construction,
traditionally considered one of the most resource-intensive activities, can
benefit greatly from a paradigm shift that incorporates ecological regeneration
rather than simple extraction and disposal.
Conclusions
The introduction of
mycelium panels in construction represents a convergence of biotechnology and
civil engineering that, just a few years ago, was considered almost futuristic.
Today, laboratory tests and pilot projects show that not only is it possible to
manufacture these panels with relatively simple resources, but they also have
mechanical and thermal properties that are compatible with the requirements of
contemporary housing, provided that their function is limited to lightweight
enclosures and insulation. Its lightness, low potential cost, compostability,
and integration with the local economy make mycelium an ideal candidate for
scenarios where the aim is to reconcile people's quality of life with active
protection of the natural environment.
However, there is still a long way to go to
refine production methodologies, validate the material with regulatory bodies,
and disseminate its benefits among end users. Part of this journey involves
multidisciplinary cooperation between microbiologists, engineers, architects,
construction companies, and, of course, the communities that could use these
panels in their homes or production facilities. As these links are consolidated
and more data is accumulated on durability, fire resistance, and performance in
high-humidity conditions, mycelium will take a definitive step from laboratory
innovation to actual integration into construction practice.
In short, mycelium is emerging as an
innovative biomaterial that could revolutionize social housing construction by
facilitating access to more sustainable and affordable solutions. The potential
of this material to promote the circular economy lies in its natural origin,
low-impact production, and ability to re-enter the biological cycle after use.
Multiple areas of research and development remain open to optimize its
properties and ensure market acceptance, which, in the long term, could
significantly contribute to the transformation of the construction industry
toward more ecological and equitable models.
Mycelium presents itself as an innovative and
sustainable alternative for the construction of social housing in vulnerable
urban contexts. Its incorporation into modular systems reduces environmental
impact, optimizes local resources, and improves the quality of life of
residents. Although there are technical and cultural limitations, the
environmental, social, and economic benefits position mycelium as a material
with high potential to contribute to reducing the housing deficit in Guayaquil
and other cities in Ecuador.
American Society for Testing and
Materials [ASTM]. (2020). Standard Test Methods for Evaluating Properties of
Wood-Base Fiber and Particle Panel Materials (ASTM D1037). ASTM International
Alemu, D., Tafesse, M., & Mondal, A.
K. (2022). Mycelium-Based Composite: The Future Sustainable Biomaterial. International Journal of
Biomaterials, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8401528
Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo [BID]. (2020). La vivienda
social y los retos de la habitabilidad en América Latina. BID
Balaeș, T., Radu, B. M., & Tănase,
C. (2023). Mycelium-Composite Materials—A Promising Alternative to Plastics?
Journal of Fungi, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/JOF9020210
Bayer, E., & McIntyre, G. (2017).
Mycelium Materials and Methods of Production. U.S. Patent US9743605B2
Bonenberg, A., Sydor, M., Cofta, G.,
Doczekalska, B., & Grygorowicz-Kosakowska, K. (2023). Mycelium-Based
Composite Materials: Study of Acceptance. Materials, 16(6), 2164.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062164
European Commission. (2010).
International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook—General guide
for Life Cycle Assessment—Detailed guidance. Publications Office of the
European Union.
Jiang, L., Walczyk, N., Mooney, B.,
& Reineke-Hildebrandt, S. (2019). Sustainable Building Materials:
Mycelium Biocomposites. Journal of Cleaner Production, 223, 536-541
Lingam, D., Narayan, S., Mamun, K.,
& Charan, D. (2023). Engineered mycelium-based composite materials:
Comprehensive study of various properties and applications. Construction and
Building Materials, 391, 131841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131841
Jones, M., Bhat, T., Kandare, E.,
Thomas, A., Joseph, P., & Dekiwadia, C. (2020). Thermal and Fire
Properties of Fungal Mycelium and Mycelium–Biofiber Composites. ACS
Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 8(2), 711-717
Rigobello, A., Colmo, C., & Ayres,
P. (2022). Effect of Composition Strategies on Mycelium-Based Composites
Flexural Behaviour. Biomimetics, 7(2), 53.
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7020053
Stamets, P. (2005). Mycelium Running:
How Mushrooms Can Help Save the World. Ten Speed Press
Sun, W., Tajvidi, M., Howell, C., &
Hunt, C. G. (2022). Insight into mycelium-lignocellulosic bio-composites:
Essential factors and properties. Composites Part A: Applied Science and
Manufacturing, 161. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2022.107125
Sydor, M., Bonenberg, A., Doczekalska,
B., & Cofta, G. (2022). Mycelium-Based Composites in Art, Architecture,
and Interior Design: A Review. Polymers, 14(1), 145.
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14010145
United Nations Environment Programme
[UNEP]. (2021). 2021 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction.
UNEP.
Vašatko, H., Gosch, L., Jauk, J., &
Stavric, M. (2022). Basic Research of Material Properties of Mycelium-Based
Composites. Biomimetics, 7(2), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7020051
Yang, F., Long, Z., & Jin, W.
(2021). Evaluation of Mycelium-based Bio-composites for Building Materials.
Construction and Building Materials, 283, 122732.
Zah, R., Hischier, R., Leão, A. L.,
& Brown, I. (2014). Curauá Fibers in the Automotive Industry: A Life
Cycle Assessment (LCA) Study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 81, 70-79.
Zimele, Z., Irbe, I., Grinins, J.,
Bikovens, O., Verovkins, A., & Bajare, D. (2020). Novel mycelium-based
biocomposites (Mbb) as building materials. Journal of Renewable Materials,
8(9), 1067–1076. https://doi.org/10.32604/jrm.2020.0964