Ángel Antonio Palomino Castillo, Jaime Alexandre Rodríguez Peñafiel
while seven studies establish a relationship between PCMC and
medication errors. The results reveal various interventions carried
out by different healthcare professionals, such as nurses, physicians
and pharmacists, who implement various elements of the MACP in
order to contribute to the control of adverse events.
In research on the detection of adverse events in adult patients
discharged from a Critical Patient Unit using a specific search tool,
Astargo (2016) found that 93% of adverse events (AEs) occurred
during hospitalization, being more common (61%) in patients with
hospital stays of at least 15 days. It was observed that 57% of
triggers led to the identification of an adverse event, with 64%
being of moderate severity. Adverse events related to care and care
accounted for 29%, healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) for 20%,
medication use for 18%, and those related to surgical procedures
for 17%. Surprisingly, 92% of the adverse events detected had not
been previously reported at the institution.
In the thesis entitled "Biosafety measures applied by the nursing
staff during the patient's hospital stay at the Dr. José Garcés
Rodríguez Hospital", Panimboza, C., and Pardo, L. (2013), revealed
that knowledge about the principles of biosafety measures reached
71%, while knowledge about the adequate use of personal
protection barriers was 75%. Regarding the application of physical
protection barriers, it was observed that these were always
implemented in 19%, while chemical barriers were always applied
in 41%. As for the proper management of hospital waste, this was
always carried out in 55% of the cases. In general terms, with regard
to the application of biosecurity measures, 36% of the respondents
indicated that they always applied them, 31% sometimes, and 33%
never. These results underscore the urgent need to implement an
education and awareness project through lectures to improve the
application of biosafety measures by nursing staff.