Each article received undergoes a review and selection process. The initial review and selection of manuscripts is carried out by the Editorial Committee, which accepts or rejects originals based on their scientific quality, relevance to the journal's topics, and the current validity of the results. In addition, the Editorial Committee may request modifications and make recommendations deemed necessary to bring the document into line with the journal's guidelines.

The articles will be reviewed using a double-blind peer review process by two external academic peers, who will issue an opinion that may be: approved without changes, approved subject to minor changes and no further review required, approved subject to major changes and further review required, or rejected as not suitable for publication in the journal. In the event of controversy arising from the reviewers' opinions, these will be resolved initially by the Editor or, if necessary, a second or third review will be requested from academic peers.

Anonymity is required for both authors and reviewers during the evaluation process. Similarly, the author of the article will be informed of the evaluation via email so that they can make any necessary adjustments requested by the reviewers. Upon receipt of the article with the corrections made, the Journal will verify compliance with the reviewers' suggestions and analyze the justifications for those that have not been taken into account. Once this phase has been approved, the article will be sent back to the author, if necessary, to make any necessary adjustments. The review and acceptance process for submitted material can take an average of four months, and receipt does not imply automatic approval and publication.