Optimizing the use of technological resources: how to manage the digital divide from management perspective?

Main Article Content

Liliana Napa-Arévalo
Omar Oviedo-Armijos
Joseph Espinoza-Astudillo

Abstract

Digital transformation in education has demonstrated that technology availability does not ensure meaningful pedagogical integration or reduction of inequalities. This study examines how school leadership influences the optimization of technological resources to address the digital divide. A mixed-method multiple case study was conducted in eight primary and secondary institutions. Data collection included semi-structured interviews with administrators, questionnaires completed by 247 teachers, and institutional document analysis. Results show a significant association between perceived technological sufficiency and school ownership (χ² = 18.47; p < 0.01). Three strategic management levels were identified: infrastructure provision, teacher training, and advanced curricular integration. The regression model explained 38% of the variance in teacher digital competence, with advanced technology uses as the strongest predictor (β = 0.42; p < 0.001). The study concludes that technological optimization requires sustained pedagogical leadership, institutional coherence, and multidimensional strategies focused on digital equity.

Article Details

Section

Artículos

How to Cite

Optimizing the use of technological resources: how to manage the digital divide from management perspective?. (2026). Revista Repique, 8(1), 38-53. https://doi.org/10.31876/hzhpm120

References

Eickelmann, B., & Gerick, J. (2020). Lernen mit digitalen Medien: Zielsetzungen in Zeiten von Digitalisierung und unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von ICILS 2018. DDS – Die Deutsche Schule, 112(2), 153–168.

Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Duckworth, D. (2020). Preparing for life in a digital world: IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study 2018 international report. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38781-5

Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.

Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2019). Teacher leadership and educational change. School Leadership & Management, 39(2), 123–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1574964

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077

OECD. (2019). OECD skills outlook 2019: Thriving in a digital world. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/df80bc12-en

Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770

Reimers, F. M., & Schleicher, A. (2020). A framework to guide an education response to the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020. OECD.

Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury.

SITEAL. (2022). La inclusión digital en los sistemas educativos de América Latina. IIPE-UNESCO OEI.

van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.

Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2018). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(5), 466–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12282

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.