The violation of the right to life and personal integrity in the context of state abuse of power
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Ecuador case is to assess the human rights violations suffered by the victims, specifically regarding acts of torture, cruel and inhuman treatment, as well as the lack of investigation and due diligence within the Ecuadorian judicial system. The research problem arises from the declining actions of the Ecuadorian government and its judicial system, as well as the weak enforcement of existing laws and the guarantees established by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. The objective is to determine whether there was a lack of investigation and judicial diligence, as well as compliance with the reparations and non-repetition measures established by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. This analysis employs qualitative methods, including documentary review of expert evidence, witness statements, and medical reports presented during the judicial process. The main results of the analysis indicate documented violations of the victims' personal integrity, who were subjected to torture and degrading treatment. It is also concluded that the Court ordered restitution, reparations, and human rights training for state officials.
Detalles del artículo
Sección

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Cómo citar
Referencias
Constituent Assembly of Ecuador (2008). Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador. Quito: Constitutional Tribunal of Ecuador. Official Register No. 449.
Bajaña Rivera, J. M. (2023). La efectividad del habeas corpus como herramienta de protección al derecho de la libertad personal en Ecuador (Undergraduate thesis).
General Organic Code of Proceedings. (2015). Código Orgánico General de Procesos. Quito: Corporación de Estudios y Publicaciones.
Committee against Torture (1984). Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 39/46.
American Convention on Human Rights (1969). Pact of San José. Organization of American States.
Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984). United Nations.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights (2016). Case of Herrera Espinoza et al. v. Ecuador: Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of September 1, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.corteidh.or.cr
Inter-American Court of Human Rights (2018). ABC of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: The what, how, when, where and why of the Inter-American Court.
Mera Ulloa, B. J., & Mendoza Calderón, T. A. (2017). Case of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Herrera Espinoza et al. v. Republic of Ecuador): Violation of the right to personal integrity, judicial guarantees and the right to judicial protection.
United Nations (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Resolution 217 A (III). https://www.un.org/es/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
Pontón Buitrón, P. A. (2017). El derecho de las víctimas a la reparación integral en el sistema penal ecuatoriano (Undergraduate thesis, Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo).
Semanate Sánchez, F. O. (2015). Employment of the Armed Forces in drug trafficking control operations and its impact on security in Ecuador: 2009-2012 (Master's thesis, IAEN).
SIJUFOR. (2021, October 2). The right to personal liberty. Retrieved from https://www.sijufor.org/informacioacuten-relevante-en-materia-juriacutedica/elderecho-a-la-libertad-personal
Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (2023). Protocolo sobre la legalidad de las detenciones en el sistema de justicia penal. https://www.scjn.gob.mx/derechos-humanos/sites/default/files/protocolos/archivos/2023-12/Protocolo-sobre-legalidad-de-detenciones-en-el-sistema-de-%20justicia-penal_0.pdf